Hammer NU 2.0 Review
The Hammer NU 2.0 bridges urethane control and reactive power for smoother, more predictable motion than either alone. Video reviews inside.
Oh, that's out of here. Cut. >> Cut. [laughter] Welcome Hammer fans. Robert Smith here and today we get to show off the brand new NU 2.0. Same weight block as the original NU blue one, but uh a much different shell. This is the NU Active. So, we're going to go out and give this a shot. But what we're going to do is make sure that we are looking at this ball properly. We are going to compare it to the oldie but goody purple. Both are
brand new. Both I have not thrown any shots with. Um, you know, the big thing I believe with this one is we're trying to get into that urethane shape without actually using what you know, a urethane shell. And um, hopefully what we're going to see is one, a big difference between what both of these bowling balls are going to look like out of the box. two is we're going to see what's going to happen with that NU cover stock when we add a little surface to see if maybe if we add enough surface to it, we might get something very similar to what the purple offers. So that's the goal. Don't
know what's going to happen here. These bowling balls are fresh, brand new. I haven't thrown any shots with them whatsoever. And I believe we're going on the 38T Albby pattern. So we're going to take a look, see what's going on, and let's have some fun with this. So So we're going to start out with the purple because everybody knows what the purple does. And if anybody's watched the old video of me, we know that this ball out of the box first shot is absolutely hilarious. So, let's watch and see what this thing does.
So, as usual, first shot out of the gate with a brand new purple. Does what it always does, hooks way too much. So, let's give this ball a couple more shots. Let's see it calm down a little bit and we'll go from there. And just like that, there it goes. All right. So, we're back to getting straighter. So, the big thing with urethanes is always, you know, you're you're looking
at making sure that the ball's hooking early enough. And that's the big thing that esses offer, especially with the purple. you can get on top of the oil patterns a little bit. See where the shape is in front. You know, getting the ball to check up early and read the lane. So, we're gonna move about five boards, right? See if we can get this ball to hook again. There we go. Okay. So, three shots. You can see break down. The purple urethane calms down
nicely. Um, I'm going to give it one more shot just make sure this is good and then we're going to go right to the new NU 2.0. Again, very curious to see what this ball is going to offer. All right, so one more shot there. Maybe sniff even a little more right just cuz. Oh, okay. Good release. So, you can see I definitely moved a lot right from that
first shot. I'm almost 10 boards right from where I was before. So, um, with that being said, let's go ahead and let's switch up the bowls. Let's see what this NU 2.0 has in store. First off, I like the solid color, especially the gray. Looks sharp. Looks old school a little bit to me, even though it says NU on it. So, all right. All right. So, we're going to stand in the same spot the purple did. See what we get.
That wasn't bad. That was not bad at all. Little bit more angular off the spot, which is to be expected because it is a not urethane cover stock. But again, like anything else, especially with this kind of bowling balls, I'm assuming these are going to get a little bit straighter. So, I'm going to go ahead and inch a little bit to the right. So, I'm going to be two boards right from where I was with that purple hammer with this one. See what we get.
Wow. Very responsive. Very responsive off the spot. I like what it's offering. I like the fact that it's a little bit straighter, but usually when you're playing that kind of line with the urethane shape or, you know, the straighter up the gutter line, you don't like to see the ball necessarily go that far down the lane. So, what we're going to do is we're going to change the surface on this to see if we can get this ball to pick up a little bit sooner, see how the back end shapes out of it, and we'll run from
there. So, all right, give me a second. Let me do some changes on this. I've got everything from 360 all the way up to 4,000. Um, to me, normally 4,000 2,000 really doesn't do much as far as helping me out any. So, I'm going to go to my old favorite, which is a 500 grit. Uh, since the ball's not flaring too much, we'll be able to just kind of keep the sanding right there along the track. Not terribly worried about the rest of the ball, but we'll make it legal just because we're supposed to, and we'll go
from there. So, all right. We have a 500 grit, lightly sanded, but 500. Let me see if I can step out of this shot and let you guys see what this ball's doing. So, same exact spot that we did the shot before, and we'll go from there. What was that? [laughter] Okay.
That that was not expected. I mean, that was a light hand sand 500 grit. And I'm sure that thing was used, too. And that thing hooked at my foot. Oh my gosh. All right. I got to see if that did that again. I I don't That is amazing. Did it really hook that early? That was a quick change on the surface, too. Holy
I'll be honest with you. I've been doing this a long time and I have never seen that much of a difference in distance just on that much surface change. I've never seen that much distance. That's got to be like 25 ft. Okay, I'm going to make the move. Let's see how far we need to go left. Wow. Five, six. I'm missing the head pin left. Seven. Eight boards. Let's go. Eight boards.
Not enough. Okay, that is a very aggressive shape for being something that should not be that aggressive. This is kind of fun. I'm curious to see like if we can manipulate the distance down or the uh surface down a little bit. So, normally I run a 500 grit. I think that 500 might be a bit much. So, we're going to go with a 2000 grit. See if we can smooth that up a little
bit. Again, I'm very shocked at how aggressive and early this ball was compared to out of the box to just sanding it with that light 500. That was absolutely amazing. All right, so let's go back our eight left. See if we can get this calming down, folks. I This is the first run. It's the first
time I've ever seen this ball go down the lane, and I've never seen a ball that you can change the surface that much to it and see that big of a difference on what you're going to get out of the ball. Everything was a hand sand. Usually, that doesn't do much to begin with. And this thing absolutely adjusted in accordance to what the the surface was. I mean, this is absolutely awesome. So, I'm going to throw one more shot and let you guys run. But enjoy this. I think if anybody's looking for something maybe a little bit worried about the urethane talk that's going on,
this might be a great look into um this cover stock is something different for sure. So, let's get one more and get on out of here. All right, close. All right, guys. Hope you enjoyed that video. Um, again, the brand new NU 2.0 with the NU active cover stock on it. Uh, anyways, hope you enjoyed the video. Until next one, have
a good one. Bye.
Performance Analysis
Performance Analysis
Testing on a heavily oil-depleted house shot at Rockford Lanes revealed the Hammer NU 2.0 to be a straightforward, predictable reactive solid that delivers controlled motion without excessive board movement. Independent reviewers noted that the ball’s reactive solid coverstock provided noticeably improved traction compared to its predecessor—specifically addressing lane shine issues observed in the original NU model. On the burnt-up house pattern, the ball maintained a clean, simple roll through the front part of the lane with minimal angular motion, making it an exceptionally forgiving option for bowlers who prefer controlled, direct ball motion over dramatic hook potential. Testers found that the ball responded predictably to hand position adjustments; increasing hand rotation and throwing with reduced ball speed produced moderate backup motion, while straighter releases resulted in minimal board crossing.
The symmetric core paired with the improved reactive solid cover created a motion profile that independent reviewers consistently compared favorably to urethane characteristics—delivering that classic, no-frills ball reaction that many bowlers associate with older hammer equipment. One notable advantage was the absence of the lane shine problems that plagued earlier versions; testing showed no significant oil carryover on the ball surface even during extended play sessions. The NU 2.0 proved most effective when played with a straighter line, demonstrating that its true strength lies in simplicity rather than versatility. For bowlers accustomed to reactive equipment seeking maximum shape and angular motion, this ball may feel limited; however, for those prioritizing controlled, predictable motion on lighter oil conditions, it delivered exactly what the marketing materials promised.
Who Is This Ball For?
The Hammer NU 2.0 is ideally suited for bowlers throwing on medium-light oil house shots, particularly those playing shorter oil patterns or burnt-up lane conditions common in local bowling centers. This ball works best for players who value straightforward, predictable ball motion and prefer to play straighter angles rather than cross multiple boards—bowlers who want a reactive solid that behaves with simplicity and consistency without the complexity of higher-performance asymmetric equipment. At $149.95, it represents an economical option for competitive league bowlers looking to add a solid coverstock alternative to their arsenal without the steep learning curve of specialty reactive or urethane balls.
Slower-speed bowlers and those still developing their technique will appreciate the forgiving nature of the symmetric core and the ball’s resistance to lane shine under less-than-ideal lane conditions. Conversely, this ball may not appeal to bowlers seeking dramatic angular reaction or those playing on fresh, higher-volume oil patterns. It’s a specialist’s tool—one that fills a specific niche in modern competitive bowling rather than serving as an all-purpose workhorse—making it perfect for bowlers who understand their game and know they need a simple, reliable solid in their bag.
The Pros
- • NU Active coverstock is slightly more aggressive than the original NU formula
- • Reactive resin technology with urethane-like control and predictability
- • Excellent on high-friction surfaces where reactive balls overreact
- • Clean matte grey finish — all performance, no flash
- • Versatile across league and tournament conditions
The Cons
- • Not a true urethane — won't behave identically to urethane on short patterns
- • Limited backend reaction compared to full reactive equipment
Who Is This Ball For?
The Hammer NU 2.0 bridges urethane control and reactive power for smoother, more predictable motion than either alone. Video reviews inside.
Technical Specifications
How It Compares
More Videos (8)
Hammer NU 2.0 Not Urethane | Release Video
Hammer Bowling
Hammer NU 2.0 | Uncut Deep Dive | The Truth About No Thane
Real Experience Bowling
THE MATCH! Race To 4! | Maximum Bob vs. The Real Deal | NU 2.0 Challenge
Hammer Bowling
NU 2.0 HAS DROPPED THE HAMMER!
Hammer Bowling
IS THIS FINALLY IT?! 🤔 | Hammer NU 2.0
BrunsNick
HAMMER NU 2.0 | This One's . . Complicated . .
Luke Rosdahl
All the Not Urethanes! | Hammer NU 2.0
The Hype
Why? | Hammer NU 2.0 | Not Urethane
The HypeVerified Bowler Reviews (23 reviews, 4.7/5 avg)
Bowlers Say
Bowlers say the NU 2.0 provides excellent control and smooth motion through the front part of the lane with gradual backend hook. Most praise its controllability and consistent ball reaction, though one bowler found it hooks too much. Works well on house shots with surface adjustments.
AI summary of 23 verified purchase reviews
Bowlers frequently mention:
The NU 2.0 gives me the control I needed on the front part of the lanes while still giving me of hook on the back ends.
I've only rolled this ball for a total of 13 games, and I really like the way it performs.
Missouri, United States
This ball is nothing like advertised. Hooks extremely too much. Hooks an amazing amount. Hard to control. Hoping to get a refund honestly
Here is my take on the new Hammer NU 2.0. The Hammer features the high RG/low diff LED symmetric core wrapped by the NU Active coverstock colored in matte gray. Box finish is 2000 Siaair. This video is shot on fresh THS and the layout on the ball is 0 x 4 x 15. I tried the ball at box surface. The Hammer NU 2.0 is the latest release in providing bowlers with a "urethanesque", slow response type of motion but still not being an actual urethane ball and thus, subject to seemingly very confusing and ever changing rules and regulations depending on where and what event a bowler is participating. The intent in the 2.0 was to provide a little more overall hook than the original Hammer NU. I can't give an actual side by side comparison because I drilled this NU 2.0 differently than the original Hammer NUs. That being said, to my eye, it does show a little more overall motion than the original NU. At box surface, it definitely gets through the front easily and makes a very gradual rounded move off the spot. I felt personally speaking for my game only, at box surface, I was bit "in between" if you will. By that I mean, for this type of shape, I want to see the ball pick up a touch earlier. If I am seeing this distance that the NU 2.0 at box surface is showing, then I want to see a quicker response and more shape to make sure the ball faces the pins correctly. I believe that with a more aggressive surface prep, perhaps at 800 or 1000 Siaair, I'll see that earlier zone better and thus the move off the spot will match up to the pocket better. I'll be trying that very soon and feel confident that with a more aggressive surface prep, the NU 2.0 will be a nice addition to the arsenal. The Hammer NU 2.0 is readily available. See your local pro shop for more information.
I drilled the NU 2.0 to try to play outside, closer to the dry on a fresh "House Shot". Factory finish was little too shiny for what I wanted, so I hit it with a 3000 pad, just to get the shine off. Worked really well for what I was looking for. I will keep experimenting with different pads as I hit different lane conditions. VERY smooth transition!
Showing 1–5 of 7 verified reviews
Frequently Asked Questions
What oil condition is the Hammer NU 2.0 best for?
Is the Hammer NU 2.0 good for beginners?
What is the RG and differential of the Hammer NU 2.0?
How much does the Hammer NU 2.0 cost?
What type of bowler should use the Hammer NU 2.0?
Never Miss a Release
Join serious bowlers getting the weekly data dump on new ball releases and performance data.